NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB and NVIDIA Quadro K6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 89% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 797 MHz
• Around 89% higher boost clock speed: 1708 MHz vs 902 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 88% lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 225 Watt
• Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 6008 MHz
• Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9761 vs 8060
• Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 772 vs 535
• Around 34% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 32308 vs 24089
• Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 115.073 vs 67.178
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.057 vs 7.435
• Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 425.709 vs 355.166

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K6000

• Around 76% higher texture fill rate: 216.5 GTexel / s vs 123.0 GTexel / s
• 2.5x more pipelines: 2880 vs 1152
• Around 32% better floating-point performance: 5,196 gflops vs 3,935 gflops
• 4x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 3 GB
• Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1816.61 vs 1325.07
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 88.889 vs 31.946
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12657 vs 10566
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3338
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12657 vs 10566
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3338

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K6000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	9761 8060
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	772 535
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	32308 24089
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	115.073 67.178
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1325.07 1816.61
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.057 7.435
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31.946 88.889
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	425.709 355.166
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10566 12657
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3697 3711
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3338 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10566 12657
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3697 3711
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3338 3356

Compare specifications (specs)