NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile

• 741.5x more texture fill rate: 91.20 GTexel/s vs 123.0 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
• 6.7x lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 120 Watt
• Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
• Around 22% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39487 vs 32308
• Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 157.821 vs 115.073
• Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1934.012 vs 1325.07
• Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.833 vs 8.057
• 4.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 136.552 vs 31.946
• Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 684.333 vs 425.709

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB

• Around 76% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 855 MHz
• Around 20% higher boost clock speed: 1708 MHz vs 1425 MHz
• Around 13% higher pipelines: 1152 vs 1024
• 6.4x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)
• Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9762 vs 7790
• Around 65% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 772 vs 469
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10566 vs 9851
• Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3697 vs 2476
• Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3338 vs 2238
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10566 vs 9851
• Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3697 vs 2476
• Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3338 vs 2238

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7790 9762
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	469 772
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	39487 32308
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	157.821 115.073
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1934.012 1325.07
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.833 8.057
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	136.552 31.946
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	684.333 425.709
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9851 10566
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2476 3697
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2238 3338
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9851 10566
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2476 3697
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2238 3338

Compare specifications (specs)