NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB vs AMD Radeon R9 290

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB and AMD Radeon R9 290 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 1 month(s) later
  • Around 59% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 947 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
  • 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 275 Watt
  • Around 25% higher maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 4 GB
  • Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 5000 MHz
  • Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9039 vs 8313
  • Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10818 vs 6300
  • Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10818 vs 6300
  • Around 6% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3907 vs 3684
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 26 December 2017 vs 5 November 2013
Core clock speed 1506 MHz vs 947 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 16 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 120 Watt vs 275 Watt
Maximum memory size 5 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed 8008 MHz vs 5000 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 9039 vs 8313
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 10818 vs 6300
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3358 vs 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 10818 vs 6300
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3358 vs 3354
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 3907 vs 3684

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 290

  • Around 11% higher texture fill rate: 151.5 GTexel / s vs 136.7 GTexel / s
  • 2x more pipelines: 2560 vs 1280
  • Around 11% better floating-point performance: 4,849 gflops vs 4,375 gflops
  • Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 775 vs 614
  • 3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 102277 vs 33562
  • Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3711 vs 3417
  • Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3711 vs 3417
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 151.5 GTexel / s vs 136.7 GTexel / s
Pipelines 2560 vs 1280
Floating-point performance 4,849 gflops vs 4,375 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 775 vs 614
Geekbench - OpenCL 102277 vs 33562
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3711 vs 3417
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3711 vs 3417

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 290

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
9039
8313
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
614
775
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
33562
102277
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
10818
6300
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3417
3711
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3358
3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
10818
6300
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3417
3711
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3358
3354
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
3907
3684
Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB AMD Radeon R9 290
PassMark - G3D Mark 9039 8313
PassMark - G2D Mark 614 775
Geekbench - OpenCL 33562 102277
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 10818 6300
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3417 3711
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3358 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 10818 6300
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3417 3711
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3358 3354
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 3907 3684
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 89.325
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1366.314
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 10.034
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 98.765
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 540.645

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB AMD Radeon R9 290

Essentials

Architecture Pascal GCN 2.0
Code name GP106 Hawaii
Launch date 26 December 2017 5 November 2013
Place in performance rating 309 348
Type Desktop Desktop
Design AMD Radeon R9 200 Series
Launch price (MSRP) $399

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1709 MHz
Core clock speed 1506 MHz 947 MHz
Floating-point performance 4,375 gflops 4,849 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 16 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 1280 2560
Texture fill rate 136.7 GTexel / s 151.5 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 120 Watt 275 Watt
Transistor count 4,400 million 6,200 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
VGA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 250 mm 275 mm
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 5 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 160.2 GB / s 320.0 GB / s
Memory bus width 160 Bit 512 Bit
Memory clock speed 8008 MHz 5000 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5

Technologies

HD3D
LiquidVR
TressFX
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)