NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB vs NVIDIA Tesla M2090
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB and NVIDIA Tesla M2090 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 2.3x more core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 650 MHz
- 3.8x more texture fill rate: 136.7 GTexel / s vs 36.4 GTexel / s
- 2.5x more pipelines: 1280 vs 512
- 3.3x better floating-point performance: 4,375 gflops vs 1,331.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 2.2x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 3700 MHz
- 2.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 35369 vs 13075
- 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 119.148 vs 33.87
- Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1373.562 vs 1127.187
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.694 vs 3.833
- 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 454.799 vs 119.136
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 19 July 2016 vs 25 July 2011 |
| Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 650 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 136.7 GTexel / s vs 36.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1280 vs 512 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,375 gflops vs 1,331.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 3700 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 35369 vs 13075 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 119.148 vs 33.87 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1373.562 vs 1127.187 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.694 vs 3.833 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 454.799 vs 119.136 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M2090
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 57.33 vs 21.766
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 57.33 vs 21.766 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M2090
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB | NVIDIA Tesla M2090 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10079 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 747 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 35369 | 13075 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 119.148 | 33.87 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1373.562 | 1127.187 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.694 | 3.833 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.766 | 57.33 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 454.799 | 119.136 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12442 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12442 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 907 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB | NVIDIA Tesla M2090 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | GP106 | GF110 |
| Launch date | 19 July 2016 | 25 July 2011 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $299 | |
| Place in performance rating | 356 | 1090 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1709 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1506 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 4,375 gflops | 1,331.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 512 |
| Texture fill rate | 136.7 GTexel / s | 36.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4,400 million | 3,000 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 250 mm | 248 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB / s | 177.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | 3700 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 6 GB vs
ATIRadeon X1950 CrossFire Edition
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 6 GB vs
AMDRadeon E8870
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 6 GB vs
NVIDIATitan X Pascal
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 6 GB vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 6 GB vs
AMDRadeon RX 580 2048SP
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 6 GB vs
IntelArc A570M
