NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) vs NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) and NVIDIA GeForce 940MX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- Around 58% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 954 MHz
- Around 72% higher boost clock speed: 1708 MHz vs 993 MHz
- 5.6x more texture fill rate: 133.6 GTexel / s vs 23.83 GTexel / s
- 3.3x more pipelines: 1280 vs 384
- 5.6x better floating-point performance: 4,275 gflops vs 762.6 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- 5.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8160 vs 1516
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 444 vs 172
- 4.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 31098 vs 6325
- 3.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 111.55 vs 28.91
- 4.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1371.266 vs 312.94
- 4.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.49 vs 1.83
- 4.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 509.222 vs 103.937
- 5.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12645 vs 2486
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3654 vs 3587
- 5.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12645 vs 2486
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3654 vs 3587
- 6.3x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3677 vs 585
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 August 2016 vs 28 June 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 954 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1708 MHz vs 993 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 133.6 GTexel / s vs 23.83 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1280 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 4,275 gflops vs 762.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8160 vs 1516 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 444 vs 172 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 31098 vs 6325 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.55 vs 28.91 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1371.266 vs 312.94 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.49 vs 1.83 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 509.222 vs 103.937 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12645 vs 2486 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3654 vs 3587 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12645 vs 2486 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3654 vs 3587 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3677 vs 585 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
- 5.2x lower typical power consumption: 23 Watt vs 120 Watt
- Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.833 vs 19.803
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt vs 120 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.833 vs 19.803 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) | NVIDIA GeForce 940MX |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8160 | 1516 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 444 | 172 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 31098 | 6325 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.55 | 28.91 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1371.266 | 312.94 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.49 | 1.83 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.803 | 27.833 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 509.222 | 103.937 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12645 | 2486 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3654 | 3587 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12645 | 2486 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3654 | 3587 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3677 | 585 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) | NVIDIA GeForce 940MX | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell |
Code name | GP106B | GM108 |
Launch date | 15 August 2016 | 28 June 2016 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $237.11 | |
Place in performance rating | 385 | 1071 |
Price now | $229.99 | |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 49.49 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1708 MHz | 993 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz | 954 MHz |
CUDA cores | 1280 | |
Floating-point performance | 4,275 gflops | 762.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Pipelines | 1280 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 133.6 GTexel / s | 23.83 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 23 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,400 million | 1,870 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | DP 1.43, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI | No outputs |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Laptop size | large | medium sized |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192 GB / s | 40.1 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
GameStream | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
Surround | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
VR Ready | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
Optimus |