NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) versus NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) and NVIDIA GeForce 940MX pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 58% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1506 MHz versus 954 MHz
- Environ 72% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1708 MHz versus 993 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 133.6 GTexel / s versus 23.83 GTexel / s
- 3.3x plus de pipelines: 1280 versus 384
- 5.6x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 4,275 gflops versus 762.6 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 16 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 6 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 60% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 8008 MHz versus 5012 MHz
- 5.4x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 8160 versus 1516
- 2.6x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 444 versus 172
- 4.9x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 31098 versus 6325
- 3.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 111.55 versus 28.91
- 4.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1371.266 versus 312.94
- 4.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.49 versus 1.83
- 4.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 509.222 versus 103.937
- 5.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12645 versus 2486
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3654 versus 3587
- 5.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12645 versus 2486
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3654 versus 3587
- 6.3x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3677 versus 585
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 15 August 2016 versus 28 June 2016 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1506 MHz versus 954 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1708 MHz versus 993 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 133.6 GTexel / s versus 23.83 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1280 versus 384 |
Performance á point flottant | 4,275 gflops versus 762.6 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 16 nm versus 28 nm |
Taille de mémore maximale | 6 GB versus 4 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8008 MHz versus 5012 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8160 versus 1516 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 444 versus 172 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 31098 versus 6325 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.55 versus 28.91 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1371.266 versus 312.94 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.49 versus 1.83 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 509.222 versus 103.937 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12645 versus 2486 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3654 versus 3587 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12645 versus 2486 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3654 versus 3587 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3677 versus 585 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
- 5.2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 23 Watt versus 120 Watt
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.833 versus 19.803
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt versus 120 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.833 versus 19.803 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) | NVIDIA GeForce 940MX |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8160 | 1516 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 444 | 172 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 31098 | 6325 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.55 | 28.91 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1371.266 | 312.94 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.49 | 1.83 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.803 | 27.833 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 509.222 | 103.937 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12645 | 2486 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3654 | 3587 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12645 | 2486 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3654 | 3587 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3677 | 585 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) | NVIDIA GeForce 940MX | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell |
Nom de code | GP106B | GM108 |
Date de sortie | 15 August 2016 | 28 June 2016 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $237.11 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 385 | 1071 |
Prix maintenant | $229.99 | |
Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 49.49 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1708 MHz | 993 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1506 MHz | 954 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 1280 | |
Performance á point flottant | 4,275 gflops | 762.6 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Température maximale du GPU | 94 °C | |
Pipelines | 1280 | 384 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 133.6 GTexel / s | 23.83 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 23 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 4,400 million | 1,870 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | DP 1.43, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI | No outputs |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Taille du laptop | large | medium sized |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 6 GB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 192 GB / s | 40.1 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | 64 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8008 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
GameStream | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
Surround | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
VR Ready | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
Optimus |