NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon RX 480
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q and AMD Radeon RX 480 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 0 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 17% higher boost clock speed: 1480 MHz vs 1266 MHz
- 653.3x better floating-point performance: 3,789 gflops vs 5.8 TFLOPs
- Around 88% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 7000 MHz
- Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 147.271 vs 103.851
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1681.162 vs 769.541
- Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.754 vs 7.593
- Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 98.592 vs 67.879
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12767 vs 11172
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12767 vs 11172
- 3.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3316 vs 968
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 June 2017 vs 29 June 2016 |
Boost clock speed | 1480 MHz vs 1266 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 3,789 gflops vs 5.8 TFLOPs |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 7000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 147.271 vs 103.851 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1681.162 vs 769.541 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.754 vs 7.593 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 98.592 vs 67.879 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12767 vs 11172 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12767 vs 11172 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3316 vs 968 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 480
- Around 5% higher core clock speed: 1120 MHz vs 1063 MHz
- Around 54% higher texture fill rate: 182.3 GTexel / s vs 118.4 GTexel / s
- Around 80% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1280
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8590 vs 7824
- Around 93% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 775 vs 402
- Around 30% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39553 vs 30399
- Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 597.772 vs 416.14
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1120 MHz vs 1063 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 182.3 GTexel / s vs 118.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 1280 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8590 vs 7824 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 775 vs 402 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39553 vs 30399 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 597.772 vs 416.14 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 vs 3712 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 vs 3712 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 3359 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 480
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q | AMD Radeon RX 480 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7824 | 8590 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 402 | 775 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 30399 | 39553 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 147.271 | 103.851 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1681.162 | 769.541 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.754 | 7.593 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 98.592 | 67.879 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 416.14 | 597.772 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12767 | 11172 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 | 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12767 | 11172 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 | 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3361 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3316 | 968 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q | AMD Radeon RX 480 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | GP106 | Ellesmere |
Launch date | 27 June 2017 | 29 June 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 361 | 362 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | Radeon RX 400 Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | |
Price now | $299.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 39.12 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1480 MHz | 1266 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1063 MHz | 1120 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 3,789 gflops | 5.8 TFLOPs |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 1280 | 2304 |
Texture fill rate | 118.4 GTexel / s | 182.3 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,400 million | 5,700 million |
Compute units | 36 | |
GPU Power | 110 Watt | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Bus support | n / a | |
Length | 241 mm | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB / s | 224 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | 7000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready | ||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
Enduro | ||
FreeSync | ||
FRTC | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HD3D | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore |