NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 6% higher core clock speed: 1063 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 9.1x more texture fill rate: 118.4 GTexel / s vs 13 billion / sec
- 20x more pipelines: 1280 vs 64
- 29.6x better floating-point performance: 3,789 gflops vs 128 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 65 nm
- 6x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 1 GB
- 15.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7903 vs 504
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 June 2017 vs 3 March 2009 |
| Core clock speed | 1063 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 118.4 GTexel / s vs 13 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 1280 vs 64 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,789 gflops vs 128 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 65 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7903 vs 504 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M
- Around 78% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 80 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 80 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7903 | 504 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 407 | 407 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 30239 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 147.271 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1681.162 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.754 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 98.592 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 416.14 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12767 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12767 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3316 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Tesla |
| Code name | GP106 | G94 |
| Launch date | 27 June 2017 | 3 March 2009 |
| Place in performance rating | 379 | 377 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1480 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1063 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 3,789 gflops | 128 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 64 |
| Texture fill rate | 118.4 GTexel / s | 13 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4,400 million | 505 million |
| CUDA cores | 64 | |
| Gigaflops | 192 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | DisplayPortHDMIDual Link DVILVDSSingle Link DVIVGA |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | large |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB / s | 51 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| VR Ready | ||
| CUDA | ||
| MXM 3.0 Type-B | ||
| PCI-E 2.0 | ||
| Power management | 8.0 | |
| PowerMizer 8.0 | ||
| PureVideo HD | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q vs
ATIRadeon HD 2900 XT
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q vs
ATIRadeon HD 2900 PRO
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 150M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon R9 M365X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro T2000 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5500M
