NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q and NVIDIA Quadro K6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 33% higher core clock speed: 1063 MHz vs 797 MHz
• Around 64% higher boost clock speed: 1480 MHz vs 902 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 225 Watt
• Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 6008 MHz
• Around 27% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 30314 vs 23926
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 147.271 vs 67.178
• Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.754 vs 7.435
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 98.592 vs 88.889
• Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 416.14 vs 355.166
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12767 vs 12657
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12767 vs 12657

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K6000

• Around 83% higher texture fill rate: 216.5 GTexel / s vs 118.4 GTexel / s
• 2.3x more pipelines: 2880 vs 1280
• Around 37% better floating-point performance: 5,196 gflops vs 3,789 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 6 GB
• Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8040 vs 7817
• Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 536 vs 402
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1816.61 vs 1681.162

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K6000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7817 8040
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	402 536
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	30314 23926
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	147.271 67.178
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1681.162 1816.61
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.754 7.435
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	98.592 88.889
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	416.14 355.166
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12767 12657
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3712 3711
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12767 12657
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3712 3711
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 3356

Compare specifications (specs)