NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) vs AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) and AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 43% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- 3.4x more texture fill rate: 202.0 GTexel / s vs 58.8 GTexel / s
- 2.1x more pipelines: 1920 vs 896
- 3.4x better floating-point performance: 6,463 gflops vs 1,882 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 1 GB
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13765 vs 4551
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13765 vs 4551
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 June 2016 vs 2 September 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 202.0 GTexel / s vs 58.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1920 vs 896 |
Floating-point performance | 6,463 gflops vs 1,882 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13765 vs 4551 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13765 vs 4551 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM
- Around 76% lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 750x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 8 GB/s
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6886 vs 3691
- 5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 17482 vs 3340
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6886 vs 3691
- 5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 17482 vs 3340
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 8 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6886 vs 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 17482 vs 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6886 vs 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 17482 vs 3340 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) | AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13507 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 847 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 47421 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.951 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1718.593 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.283 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.289 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 710.366 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13765 | 4551 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 | 6886 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 17482 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13765 | 4551 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 | 6886 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 17482 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6070 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) | AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | GP104 | Bonaire |
Launch date | 10 June 2016 | 2 September 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $379 | |
Place in performance rating | 278 | 279 |
Price now | $359.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 45.72 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1683 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz | 1050 MHz |
CUDA cores | 1920 | |
Floating-point performance | 6,463 gflops | 1,882 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Pipelines | 1920 | 896 |
Texture fill rate | 202.0 GTexel / s | 58.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 85 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,200 million | 2,080 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | 183 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Width | 2-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 256 GB / s | 96 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8 GB/s | 6000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality |