NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) vs AMD Radeon R9 Fury
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) and AMD Radeon R9 Fury videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- Around 68% higher boost clock speed: 1683 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 83% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 275 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13507 vs 9556
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 847 vs 789
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 150.951 vs 141.671
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13765 vs 10116
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13765 vs 10116
- Around 28% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 6070 vs 4739
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 June 2016 vs 10 July 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 1683 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 275 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13507 vs 9556 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 847 vs 789 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.951 vs 141.671 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13765 vs 10116 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13765 vs 10116 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6070 vs 4739 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 Fury
- Around 11% higher texture fill rate: 224.0 GTexel / s vs 202.0 GTexel / s
- Around 87% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 1920
- Around 11% better floating-point performance: 7,168 gflops vs 6,463 gflops
- 62.5x more memory clock speed: 500 MHz vs 8 GB/s
- Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 53258 vs 47421
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3600.035 vs 1718.593
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.2 vs 12.283
- 4.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 133.144 vs 28.289
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 791.572 vs 710.366
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3691
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3691
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 224.0 GTexel / s vs 202.0 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 1920 |
Floating-point performance | 7,168 gflops vs 6,463 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 500 MHz vs 8 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 53258 vs 47421 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3600.035 vs 1718.593 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.2 vs 12.283 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 133.144 vs 28.289 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 791.572 vs 710.366 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3340 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 Fury
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) | AMD Radeon R9 Fury |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13507 | 9556 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 847 | 789 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 47421 | 53258 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.951 | 141.671 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1718.593 | 3600.035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.283 | 13.2 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.289 | 133.144 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 710.366 | 791.572 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13765 | 10116 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13765 | 10116 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6070 | 4739 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) | AMD Radeon R9 Fury | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | GP104 | Fiji |
Launch date | 10 June 2016 | 10 July 2015 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $379 | $549 |
Place in performance rating | 278 | 281 |
Price now | $359.99 | $399.99 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 45.72 | 35.98 |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 Fury Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1683 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz | |
CUDA cores | 1920 | |
Floating-point performance | 6,463 gflops | 7,168 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Pipelines | 1920 | 3584 |
Texture fill rate | 202.0 GTexel / s | 224.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 275 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,200 million | 8,900 million |
Compute units | 56 | |
Stream Processors | 3584 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Width | 2-slot | |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 256 GB / s | 512 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 4096 bit |
Memory clock speed | 8 GB/s | 500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
FRTC | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) |