NVIDIA Quadro P4000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P4000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro P4000

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P4000

Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 150 Watt
950.5x more memory clock speed: 7604 MHz vs 8 GB/s
Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 152.325 vs 150.951
Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 45.977 vs 28.289
Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 751.626 vs 710.366
Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15267 vs 13765
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 3691
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3340
Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15267 vs 13765
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 3691
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3340

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	6 February 2017 vs 10 June 2016
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	100 Watt vs 150 Watt
Memory clock speed	7604 MHz vs 8 GB/s
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	152.325 vs 150.951
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	45.977 vs 28.289
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	751.626 vs 710.366
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	15267 vs 13765
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3714 vs 3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358 vs 3340
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	15267 vs 13765
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3714 vs 3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358 vs 3340

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)

Around 25% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 1202 MHz
Around 14% higher boost clock speed: 1683 MHz vs 1480 MHz
Around 22% higher texture fill rate: 202.0 GTexel / s vs 165.8 GTexel / s
Around 7% higher pipelines: 1920 vs 1792
Around 22% better floating-point performance: 6,463 gflops vs 5,304 gflops
Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13497 vs 11623
Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 847 vs 814
Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 47331 vs 42289
Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1718.593 vs 1590.392
Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 12.283 vs 11.365
Around 24% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 6066 vs 4904

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1506 MHz vs 1202 MHz
Boost clock speed	1683 MHz vs 1480 MHz
Texture fill rate	202.0 GTexel / s vs 165.8 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1920 vs 1792
Floating-point performance	6,463 gflops vs 5,304 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	13497 vs 11623
PassMark - G2D Mark	847 vs 814
Geekbench - OpenCL	47331 vs 42289
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1718.593 vs 1590.392
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	12.283 vs 11.365
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	6066 vs 4904

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

11623

13497

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

814

847

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

42289

47331

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

152.325

150.951

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1590.392

1718.593

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

11.365

12.283

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

45.977

28.289

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

751.626

710.366

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

15267

13765

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3714

3691

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

3340

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

15267

13765

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3714

3691

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

3340

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

4904

6066

Name	NVIDIA Quadro P4000	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark	11623	13497
PassMark - G2D Mark	814	847
Geekbench - OpenCL	42289	47331
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	152.325	150.951
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1590.392	1718.593
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	11.365	12.283
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	45.977	28.289
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	751.626	710.366
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	15267	13765
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3714	3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358	3340
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	15267	13765
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3714	3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358	3340
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	4904	6066

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro P4000	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
Essentials
Architecture	Pascal	Pascal
Code name	GP104	GP104
Launch date	6 February 2017	10 June 2016
Launch price (MSRP)	$815	$379
Place in performance rating	286	284
Price now	$799.99	$359.99
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Value for money (0-100)	17.17	45.72
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1480 MHz	1683 MHz
Core clock speed	1202 MHz	1506 MHz
Floating-point performance	5,304 gflops	6,463 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	16 nm
Pipelines	1792	1920
Texture fill rate	165.8 GTexel / s	202.0 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	100 Watt	150 Watt
Transistor count	7,200 million	7,200 million
CUDA cores		1920
Maximum GPU temperature		94 °C
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI
Display Port	1.4
G-SYNC support
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	241 mm	10.5" (26.7 cm)
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	8-pin
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
Height		4.376" (11.1 cm)
Recommended system power (PSU)		500 Watt
Width		2-slot
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Shader Model	5.1
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	8 GB
Memory bandwidth	192 GB / s	256 GB / s
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	7604 MHz	8 GB/s
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0	0
Technologies
3D Stereo
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus
3D Vision
Ansel
CUDA
GPU Boost
ShadowWorks
SLI
Virtual Reality