NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 77% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 850 MHz
- 11.3x more texture fill rate: 210.6 GTexel / s vs 18.7 billion / sec
- 5.8x more pipelines: 2048 vs 352
- 11.3x better floating-point performance: 6,738 gflops vs 598.4 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
- 6.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10465 vs 1617
- Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 603 vs 458
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 August 2016 vs 25 May 2010 |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 850 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 210.6 GTexel / s vs 18.7 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 352 |
Floating-point performance | 6,738 gflops vs 598.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10465 vs 1617 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 603 vs 458 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 150x more memory clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 8 GB/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 8 GB/s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10465 | 1617 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 603 | 458 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 47422 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.951 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1718.593 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.283 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.289 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 710.366 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13765 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13765 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5536 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Fermi |
Code name | GP104B | GF100 |
Launch date | 15 August 2016 | 25 May 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $389.99 | |
Place in performance rating | 296 | 299 |
Price now | $359.99 | |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 43.18 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1645 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz | 850 MHz |
CUDA cores | 1920 | |
Floating-point performance | 6,738 gflops | 598.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 40 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Pipelines | 2048 | 352 |
Texture fill rate | 210.6 GTexel / s | 18.7 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,200 million | 3,100 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI | No outputs |
G-SYNC support | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI-E 2.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Laptop size | large | large |
SLI options | 2-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 256 GB / s | 76.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8 GB/s | 1200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
VR Ready |