NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro P6000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q and NVIDIA Quadro P6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q

NVIDIA Quadro P6000

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q

Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
2.2x lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 250 Watt
Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 214.123 vs 194.277
Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2293.496 vs 1916.09
4.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 139.717 vs 31.471
Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 692.9 vs 545.751
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8902 vs 3715
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8048 vs 3356
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8902 vs 3715
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8048 vs 3356

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	27 June 2017 vs 1 October 2016
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	115 Watt vs 250 Watt
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	214.123 vs 194.277
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	2293.496 vs 1916.09
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	139.717 vs 31.471
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	692.9 vs 545.751
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	8902 vs 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	8048 vs 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	8902 vs 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	8048 vs 3356

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P6000

Around 24% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 1215 MHz
Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 1645 MHz vs 1379 MHz
2.2x more texture fill rate: 394.8 GTexel / s vs 176.5 GTexel / s
Around 88% higher pipelines: 3840 vs 2048
2.2x better floating-point performance: 12,634 gflops vs 5,648 gflops
3x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 8 GB
Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 9016 MHz vs 8008 MHz
Around 52% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15025 vs 9884
Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 698 vs 437
Around 59% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 60145 vs 37928
Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 17.951 vs 12.704
Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20035 vs 14915
Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20035 vs 14915
Around 79% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 8770 vs 4887

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1506 MHz vs 1215 MHz
Boost clock speed	1645 MHz vs 1379 MHz
Texture fill rate	394.8 GTexel / s vs 176.5 GTexel / s
Pipelines	3840 vs 2048
Floating-point performance	12,634 gflops vs 5,648 gflops
Maximum memory size	24 GB vs 8 GB
Memory clock speed	9016 MHz vs 8008 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	15025 vs 9884
PassMark - G2D Mark	698 vs 437
Geekbench - OpenCL	60145 vs 37928
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	17.951 vs 12.704
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	20035 vs 14915
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	20035 vs 14915
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	8770 vs 4887

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P6000

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

9884

15025

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

437

698

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

37928

60145

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

214.123

194.277

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2293.496

1916.09

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

12.704

17.951

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

139.717

31.471

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

692.9

545.751

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

14915

20035

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8902

3715

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8048

3356

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

14915

20035

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8902

3715

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8048

3356

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

4887

8770

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	NVIDIA Quadro P6000
PassMark - G3D Mark	9884	15025
PassMark - G2D Mark	437	698
Geekbench - OpenCL	37928	60145
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	214.123	194.277
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	2293.496	1916.09
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	12.704	17.951
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	139.717	31.471
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	692.9	545.751
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	14915	20035
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	8902	3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	8048	3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	14915	20035
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	8902	3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	8048	3356
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	4887	8770

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	NVIDIA Quadro P6000
Essentials
Architecture	Pascal	Pascal
Code name	GP104	GP102
Launch date	27 June 2017	1 October 2016
Place in performance rating	221	218
Type	Laptop	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$5,999
Price now		$4,403.52
Value for money (0-100)		3.90
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1379 MHz	1645 MHz
Core clock speed	1215 MHz	1506 MHz
Floating-point performance	5,648 gflops	12,634 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	16 nm
Pipelines	2048	3840
Texture fill rate	176.5 GTexel / s	394.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	115 Watt	250 Watt
Transistor count	7,200 million	11,800 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort, DVI-D DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo
G-SYNC support
Multi-display synchronization		Quadro Sync II
Number of simultaneous displays		4
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size	large
Supplementary power connectors	None	1 x 8-pin
Length		267 mm
SLI options		1
Width		2" (5.1 cm)
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Vulkan
Shader Model		5.1
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	24 GB
Memory bandwidth	256.3 GB / s
Memory bus width	256 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	8008 MHz	9016 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	384 Bit
Shared memory	0
Technologies
Multi Monitor
Multi-Projection
VR Ready
3D Vision Pro
ECC (Error Correcting Code)
High-Performance Video I/O6
Mosaic
nView Desktop Management