NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q and ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 48% higher core clock speed: 1035 MHz vs 700 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 55 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2x 1 GB
- 3.3x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 3600 MHz
- 4.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6417 vs 1309
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 16 Mar 2020 vs 12 August 2008 |
Core clock speed | 1035 MHz vs 700 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2x 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 3600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6417 vs 1309 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2
- Around 56% higher pipelines: 2x 800 vs 1024
- Around 69% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 565 vs 335
- Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3323 vs 1982
- Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3323 vs 1982
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2x 800 vs 1024 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 565 vs 335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3323 vs 1982 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3323 vs 1982 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6417 | 1309 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 335 | 565 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39431 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9780 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2168 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1982 | 3323 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9780 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2168 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1982 | 3323 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3172 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | TeraScale |
Code name | N18P-G62 | R700 |
Launch date | 16 Mar 2020 | 12 August 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 437 | 436 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $550 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1035 MHz | 700 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 2x 800 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 1,120.0 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 2x 28 GTexel / s billion / sec | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 286 Watt | |
Transistor count | 956 million | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2x 1 GB |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 2x 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Memory bandwidth | 2x 115.2 GB / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |