NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs AMD Radeon R9 270X

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q and AMD Radeon R9 270X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

AMD Radeon R9 270X

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 5 month(s) later
Around 14% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1050 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6452 vs 4875
Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9780 vs 8068
Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9780 vs 8068
Around 79% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3172 vs 1772

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	16 Mar 2020 vs 8 October 2013
Boost clock speed	1200 MHz vs 1050 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 28 nm
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	6452 vs 4875
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9780 vs 8068
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9780 vs 8068
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	3172 vs 1772

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 270X

Around 25% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 1024
Around 83% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 611 vs 334
Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3706 vs 2168
Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 vs 1982
Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3706 vs 2168
Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 vs 1982

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	1280 vs 1024
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	611 vs 334
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3706 vs 2168
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3350 vs 1982
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3706 vs 2168
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3350 vs 1982

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 270X

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

6452

4875

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

334

611

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9780

8068

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2168

3706

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1982

3350

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9780

8068

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2168

3706

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1982

3350

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

3172

1772

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q	AMD Radeon R9 270X
PassMark - G3D Mark	6452	4875
PassMark - G2D Mark	334	611
Geekbench - OpenCL	39335
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9780	8068
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2168	3706
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1982	3350
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9780	8068
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2168	3706
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1982	3350
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	3172	1772
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		63.87
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1314.72
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		6.354
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		85.21
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		315.412

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q	AMD Radeon R9 270X
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	GCN 1.0
Code name	N18P-G62	Curacao
Launch date	16 Mar 2020	8 October 2013
Place in performance rating	447	450
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Design		AMD Radeon R9 200 Series
Launch price (MSRP)		$199
Price now		$399
Value for money (0-100)		16.05
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1200 MHz	1050 MHz
Core clock speed	1035 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	1024	1280
Floating-point performance		2,688 gflops
Stream Processors		1280
Texture fill rate		84 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)		180 Watt
Transistor count		2,800 million
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Laptop size	medium sized
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
Interface		PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors		2 x 6-pin
API support
DirectX	12.1	12
OpenGL		4.5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	12000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory bandwidth		179.2 GB/s
Shared memory		0
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors		2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
Eyefinity
HDMI
VGA
Technologies
AMD Eyefinity
AppAcceleration
CrossFire
DDMA audio
FreeSync
HD3D
LiquidVR
TressFX
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)