NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs AMD FirePro S10000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q and AMD FirePro S10000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 25% higher core clock speed: 1035 MHz vs 825 MHz
- Around 26% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 950 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.4x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 5000 MHz
- Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6417 vs 4768
- Around 29% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39431 vs 30631
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9780 vs 7867
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9780 vs 7867
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 16 Mar 2020 vs 12 November 2012 |
Core clock speed | 1035 MHz vs 825 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 950 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 5000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6417 vs 4768 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39431 vs 30631 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9780 vs 7867 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9780 vs 7867 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S10000
- 4x more pipelines: 4096 vs 1024
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 50% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 502 vs 335
- Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3621 vs 2168
- Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3321 vs 1982
- Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3621 vs 2168
- Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3321 vs 1982
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 1024 |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 502 vs 335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3621 vs 2168 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3321 vs 1982 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3621 vs 2168 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3321 vs 1982 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD FirePro S10000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | AMD FirePro S10000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6417 | 4768 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 335 | 502 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39431 | 30631 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9780 | 7867 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2168 | 3621 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1982 | 3321 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9780 | 7867 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2168 | 3621 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1982 | 3321 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3172 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 73.836 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.978 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | AMD FirePro S10000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N18P-G62 | Tahiti |
Launch date | 16 Mar 2020 | 12 November 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 437 | 435 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $3,599 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 950 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1035 MHz | 825 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 4096 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 3,405 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 2x 106.4 GTexel / s billion / sec | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 750 Watt | |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Length | 305 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 2x 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Memory bandwidth | 480 GB / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort | |
Dual-link DVI support |