NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs AMD FirePro W7100
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q and AMD FirePro W7100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 13% higher core clock speed: 1035 MHz vs 920 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.4x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 5000 MHz
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6413 vs 5314
- Around 59% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39431 vs 24858
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9780 vs 6362
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9780 vs 6362
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 16 Mar 2020 vs 12 August 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 1035 MHz vs 920 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 5000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6413 vs 5314 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 39431 vs 24858 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9780 vs 6362 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9780 vs 6362 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W7100
- Around 75% higher pipelines: 1792 vs 1024
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 683 vs 333
- Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3713 vs 2168
- Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 1982
- Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3713 vs 2168
- Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 1982
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 1792 vs 1024 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 683 vs 333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 vs 2168 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 1982 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 vs 2168 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 1982 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W7100
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | AMD FirePro W7100 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6413 | 5314 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 333 | 683 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 39431 | 24858 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9780 | 6362 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2168 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1982 | 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9780 | 6362 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2168 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1982 | 3355 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3172 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.781 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1248.285 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.854 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.086 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 361.58 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | AMD FirePro W7100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | N18P-G62 | Tonga |
| Launch date | 16 Mar 2020 | 12 August 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 437 | 438 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1035 MHz | 920 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 1792 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,297 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 103.0 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 400 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 5,000 million | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Length | 241 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory bandwidth | 160 GB / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | |
| DisplayPort count | 4 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HD сomponent video output | ||
| StereoOutput3D | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs
ATIRadeon HD 4870 X2
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs
AMDFirePro S10000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon HD 8830M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs
AMDFirePro W7100
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon E6465
