NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop) vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop) and AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1560 MHz vs 1530 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 4x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 2000 MHz
Launch date | 23 April 2019 vs 13 August 2018 |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz vs 1530 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 2000 MHz |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 815 vs 384
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13932 vs 6969
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 815 vs 384 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13932 vs 6969 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop) | AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 384 | 815 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6969 | 13932 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3436 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 69812 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 171.616 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4031.404 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.925 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 247.788 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1195.863 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13044 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7164 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 30936 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13044 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7164 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 30936 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop) | AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | TU117 | Vega 10 |
Launch date | 23 April 2019 | 13 August 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 306 | 118 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
Price now | $999 | |
Type | Workstation | |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.37 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | 1530 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 896 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt | |
Transistor count | 12,500 million | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort |