NVIDIA Quadro P2200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P2200 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2200

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
• Around 43% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 896
• Around 25% higher maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9321 vs 6969
• 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 920 vs 384

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)

• Around 40% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1560 MHz vs 1493 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 1% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3436 vs 3404

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	9321 6969
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	920 384
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	3404 3436

Compare specifications (specs)