NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs Intel HD Graphics 630

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and Intel HD Graphics 630 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• 4.2x more core clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 350 MHz
• Around 45% higher boost clock speed: 1665 MHz vs 1150 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
• 7.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7881 vs 1114
• 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 564 vs 268
• 8.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39165 vs 4554
• 4.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 134.765 vs 27.948
• 4.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1316.075 vs 312.246
• 4.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.799 vs 1.795
• 4.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.915 vs 20.404
• 17.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 573.418 vs 32.567
• 5.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10959 vs 1859
• Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 1945
• 5.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10959 vs 1859
• Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 1945

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 630

• Around 27% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 388 vs 305

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 630

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7881 1114
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	564 268
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	39165 4554
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	134.765 27.948
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1316.075 312.246
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.799 1.795
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	94.915 20.404
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	573.418 32.567
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10959 1859
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 1945
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3344
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10959 1859
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 1945
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3344
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	305 388

Compare specifications (specs)