NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA Tesla M6
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and NVIDIA Tesla M6 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 60% higher core clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 930 MHz
- Around 41% higher boost clock speed: 1665 MHz vs 1180 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7878 vs 6172
- Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 570 vs 339
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10959 vs 9390
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3683
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3260
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10959 vs 9390
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3683
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3260
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 April 2019 vs 30 August 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1485 MHz vs 930 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz vs 1180 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7878 vs 6172 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 570 vs 339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10959 vs 9390 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3260 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10959 vs 9390 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3260 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M6
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | NVIDIA Tesla M6 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7878 | 6172 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 570 | 339 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39144 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 134.955 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1315.575 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.778 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.062 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 571.831 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10959 | 9390 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3260 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10959 | 9390 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3260 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3577 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | NVIDIA Tesla M6 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | TU107 | GM204 |
Launch date | 30 April 2019 | 30 August 2015 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $179 | |
Place in performance rating | 369 | 372 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz | 1180 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1485 MHz | 930 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Floating-point performance | 3,625 gflops | |
Pipelines | 1536 | |
Texture fill rate | 113.3 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory type | GDDR5 |