NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA Quadro P3000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and NVIDIA Quadro P3000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

NVIDIA Quadro P3000

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
Around 36% higher core clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 1088 MHz
Around 37% higher boost clock speed: 1665 MHz vs 1215 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 7008 MHz
Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7878 vs 6453
Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 569 vs 415
Around 52% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39112 vs 25811
Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10959 vs 9579
Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10959 vs 9579

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	30 April 2019 vs 11 January 2017
Core clock speed	1485 MHz vs 1088 MHz
Boost clock speed	1665 MHz vs 1215 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 16 nm
Memory clock speed	8000 MHz vs 7008 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	7878 vs 6453
PassMark - G2D Mark	569 vs 415
Geekbench - OpenCL	39112 vs 25811
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	10959 vs 9579
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	10959 vs 9579

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P3000

10.8x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3489 vs 324

Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3720 vs 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3360 vs 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3720 vs 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3360 vs 3358
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	3489 vs 324

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P3000

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

7878

6453

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

569

415

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

39112

25811

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

10959

9579

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3715

3720

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

3360

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

10959

9579

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3715

3720

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

3360

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

324

3489

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650	NVIDIA Quadro P3000
PassMark - G3D Mark	7878	6453
PassMark - G2D Mark	569	415
Geekbench - OpenCL	39112	25811
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	134.765
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1316.075
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	8.799
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	94.915
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	573.418
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	10959	9579
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715	3720
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358	3360
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	10959	9579
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715	3720
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358	3360
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	324	3489

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650	NVIDIA Quadro P3000
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	Pascal
Code name	TU107	N17E-Q1
Launch date	30 April 2019	11 January 2017
Launch price (MSRP)	$179
Place in performance rating	382	383
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1665 MHz	1215 MHz
Core clock speed	1485 MHz	1088 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	16 nm
Pipelines		1280
Thermal Design Power (TDP)		75 Watt
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
DisplayPort count	1
DisplayPort support
HDMI
Display Port		1.4
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None
API support
DirectX	12.0	12
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model		5.1
Memory
Memory clock speed	8000 MHz	7008 MHz
Maximum RAM amount		6 GB
Memory bandwidth		168 GB / s
Memory bus width		192 Bit
Memory type		GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Stereo
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView
nView Display Management
Optimus