NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 37% higher boost clock speed: 1665 MHz vs 1216 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
• 1142.9x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
• Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39125 vs 34835
• Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 134.765 vs 110.006
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.915 vs 37.443
• Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 573.418 vs 477.015
• Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10959 vs 9566
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3690
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3335
• Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10959 vs 9566
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3690
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3335

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980

• Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11110 vs 7877
• Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 791 vs 569
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1348.307 vs 1316.075
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.194 vs 8.799
• Around 21% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4314 vs 3577

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7877 11110
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	569 791
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	39125 34835
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	134.765 110.006
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1316.075 1348.307
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.799 9.194
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	94.915 37.443
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	573.418 477.015
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10959 9566
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3690
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3335
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10959 9566
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3690
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3335
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	3577 4314

Compare specifications (specs)