NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• Around 15% higher core clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 1290 MHz
• Around 20% higher boost clock speed: 1665 MHz vs 1392 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
• Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 7008 MHz
• Around 57% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7881 vs 5029
• Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 564 vs 457
• 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39165 vs 17466
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 134.765 vs 67.209
• Around 65% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1316.075 vs 799.414
• Around 94% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.799 vs 4.536
• 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.915 vs 30.523
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 573.418 vs 223.683
• Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10959 vs 7043
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3685
• Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10959 vs 7043
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3685
• 2.5x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 305 vs 122

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7881 5029
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	564 457
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	39165 17466
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	134.765 67.209
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1316.075 799.414
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.799 4.536
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	94.915 30.523
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	573.418 223.683
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10959 7043
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3360
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10959 7043
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3360
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	305 122

Compare specifications (specs)