NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39165 vs 35108
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10959 vs 10818
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3417
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10959 vs 10818
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3417
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 30 April 2019 vs 26 December 2017 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 39165 vs 35108 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10959 vs 10818 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3417 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10959 vs 10818 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3417 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 1485 MHz
- Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1709 MHz vs 1665 MHz
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9056 vs 7881
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 611 vs 564
- 12.8x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3917 vs 305
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 1485 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1709 MHz vs 1665 MHz |
| Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 8000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9056 vs 7881 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 611 vs 564 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3917 vs 305 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7881 | 9056 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 564 | 611 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 39165 | 35108 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 134.765 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1316.075 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.799 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.915 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 573.418 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10959 | 10818 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3417 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10959 | 10818 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3417 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 305 | 3917 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Code name | TU107 | GP106 |
| Launch date | 30 April 2019 | 26 December 2017 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $179 | |
| Place in performance rating | 376 | 303 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz | 1709 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1485 MHz | 1506 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Floating-point performance | 4,375 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 1280 | |
| Texture fill rate | 136.7 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 4,400 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 250 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 8008 MHz |
| Maximum RAM amount | 5 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.2 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 160 Bit | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4810
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 vs
NVIDIATesla M6
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P3000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 vs
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 vs
NVIDIATesla K80
