NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 11% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39165 vs 35369
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 134.765 vs 119.148
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.799 vs 8.694
• 4.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.915 vs 21.766
• Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 573.418 vs 454.799
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3691
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3340
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3691
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3340

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB

• Around 1% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 1485 MHz
• Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1709 MHz vs 1665 MHz
• Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10079 vs 7881
• Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 747 vs 564
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1373.562 vs 1316.075
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12442 vs 10959
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12442 vs 10959
• 3x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 907 vs 305

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7881 10079
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	564 747
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	39165 35369
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	134.765 119.148
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1316.075 1373.562
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.799 8.694
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	94.915 21.766
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	573.418 454.799
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10959 12442
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3340
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10959 12442
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3340
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	305 907

Compare specifications (specs)