NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 32% higher core clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 1127 MHz
• Around 41% higher boost clock speed: 1665 MHz vs 1178 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
• 1142.9x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
• Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7881 vs 6111
• 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39165 vs 18734
• Around 83% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 134.765 vs 73.733
• Around 66% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1316.075 vs 792.44
• Around 80% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.799 vs 4.888
• 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.915 vs 35.338
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 573.418 vs 200.825
• Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10959 vs 7218
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3691
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3335
• Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10959 vs 7218
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3691
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3335
• Around 88% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 305 vs 162

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

• Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 673 vs 564

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7881 6111
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	564 673
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	39165 18734
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	134.765 73.733
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1316.075 792.44
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.799 4.888
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	94.915 35.338
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	573.418 200.825
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10959 7218
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3335
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10959 7218
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3335
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	305 162

Compare specifications (specs)