NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs AMD FirePro W7170M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER and AMD FirePro W7170M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 723 MHz
- 1697.6x more texture fill rate: 157.1 GTexel/s vs 92.54 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- 4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12776 vs 3162
- Around 94% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 810 vs 418
- Around 23% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 62624 vs 50809
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17812 vs 6796
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17812 vs 6796
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 29 Oct 2019 vs 2 October 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz vs 723 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 157.1 GTexel/s vs 92.54 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12776 vs 3162 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 810 vs 418 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 62624 vs 50809 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17812 vs 6796 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17812 vs 6796 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W7170M
- Around 45% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1408
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 125 Watt
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 1408 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 125 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3722 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3362 vs 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3722 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3362 vs 3351 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W7170M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | AMD FirePro W7170M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12776 | 3162 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 810 | 418 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 62624 | 50809 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 187.131 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2548.187 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 15.882 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.673 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 901.388 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17812 | 6796 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3722 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3362 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17812 | 6796 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3722 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3362 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5978 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | AMD FirePro W7170M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | TU116 | Amethyst |
Launch date | 29 Oct 2019 | 2 October 2015 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | |
Place in performance rating | 207 | 420 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | 723 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 157.1 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.05 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.027 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1408 | 2048 |
Pixel fill rate | 85.68 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 157.1 GTexel/s | 92.54 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 6600 million | 5,000 million |
Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 9 inches (229 mm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Width | Dual-slot | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 336.0 GB/s | 160.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
Enduro |