AMD Radeon RX 5600M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5600M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5600M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 16% higher texture fill rate: 182.2 GTexel/s vs 157.1 GTexel/s
- Around 64% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1408
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8904 vs 3717
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7694 vs 3351
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8904 vs 3717
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7694 vs 3351
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 Jan 2020 vs 29 Oct 2019 |
Texture fill rate | 182.2 GTexel/s vs 157.1 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 1408 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8904 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7694 vs 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8904 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7694 vs 3351 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
- Around 41% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1265 MHz
- Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 125 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12747 vs 8796
- Around 64% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 805 vs 490
- Around 13% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 62616 vs 55515
- Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17812 vs 11117
- Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17812 vs 11117
- Around 1% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5990 vs 5931
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz vs 1265 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12747 vs 8796 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 805 vs 490 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 62616 vs 55515 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17812 vs 11117 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17812 vs 11117 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5990 vs 5931 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5600M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5600M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8796 | 12747 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 490 | 805 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55515 | 62616 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11117 | 17812 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8904 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7694 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11117 | 17812 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8904 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7694 | 3351 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5931 | 5990 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 187.131 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2548.187 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 15.882 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.673 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 901.388 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 5600M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA | Turing |
Code name | Navi 10 | TU116 |
Launch date | 7 Jan 2020 | 29 Oct 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 223 | 220 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1265 MHz | 1785 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
Pipelines | 2304 | 1408 |
Texture fill rate | 182.2 GTexel/s | 157.1 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 125 Watt |
Transistor count | 10300 million | 6600 million |
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 157.1 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.05 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.027 TFLOPS | |
Pixel fill rate | 85.68 GPixel/s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Length | 9 inches (229 mm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 336.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 192 bit |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |