AMD Radeon RX 5600M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5600M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5600M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
  • Around 16% higher texture fill rate: 182.2 GTexel/s vs 157.1 GTexel/s
  • Around 64% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1408
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8904 vs 3717
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7694 vs 3351
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8904 vs 3717
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7694 vs 3351
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 7 Jan 2020 vs 29 Oct 2019
Texture fill rate 182.2 GTexel/s vs 157.1 GTexel/s
Pipelines 2304 vs 1408
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm vs 12 nm
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 8904 vs 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 7694 vs 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 8904 vs 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 7694 vs 3351

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

  • Around 41% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1265 MHz
  • Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 125 Watt vs 150 Watt
  • Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12776 vs 8669
  • Around 65% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 810 vs 492
  • Around 9% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 62624 vs 57191
  • Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17812 vs 11117
  • Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17812 vs 11117
  • Around 2% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5978 vs 5878
Specifications (specs)
Boost clock speed 1785 MHz vs 1265 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 125 Watt vs 150 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 12776 vs 8669
PassMark - G2D Mark 810 vs 492
Geekbench - OpenCL 62624 vs 57191
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 17812 vs 11117
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 17812 vs 11117
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 5978 vs 5878

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5600M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
8669
12776
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
492
810
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
57191
62624
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
11117
17812
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8904
3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
7694
3351
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
11117
17812
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8904
3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
7694
3351
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
5878
5978
Name AMD Radeon RX 5600M NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
PassMark - G3D Mark 8669 12776
PassMark - G2D Mark 492 810
Geekbench - OpenCL 57191 62624
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 11117 17812
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 8904 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 7694 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 11117 17812
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 8904 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 7694 3351
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 5878 5978
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 187.131
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 2548.187
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 15.882
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 117.673
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 901.388

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon RX 5600M NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

Essentials

Architecture RDNA Turing
Code name Navi 10 TU116
Launch date 7 Jan 2020 29 Oct 2019
Place in performance rating 210 207
Type Laptop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $229

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1265 MHz 1785 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm 12 nm
Pipelines 2304 1408
Texture fill rate 182.2 GTexel/s 157.1 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 150 Watt 125 Watt
Transistor count 10300 million 6600 million
Core clock speed 1530 MHz
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 157.1 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 10.05 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 5.027 TFLOPS
Pixel fill rate 85.68 GPixel/s

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size medium sized
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 8-pin
Length 9 inches (229 mm)
Recommended system power (PSU) 350 Watt
Width Dual-slot

API support

DirectX 12 12.1
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.4 6.4
OpenCL 1.2
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 6 GB
Memory bandwidth 288.0 GB/s 336.0 GB/s
Memory bus width 192 bit 192 bit
Memory clock speed 12000 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6