NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- Around 59% higher core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 960 MHz
- Around 49% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12750 vs 11355
- Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 806 vs 540
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17812 vs 17150
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17812 vs 17150
- Around 1% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5990 vs 5906
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 29 Oct 2019 vs 29 January 2019 |
| Core clock speed | 1530 MHz vs 960 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12750 vs 11355 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 806 vs 540 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17812 vs 17150 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17812 vs 17150 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5990 vs 5906 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
- Around 36% higher pipelines: 1920 vs 1408
- Around 56% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 125 Watt
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 1920 vs 1408 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 125 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 vs 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 vs 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3351 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12750 | 11355 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 806 | 540 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 62663 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 187.131 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2548.187 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 15.882 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.673 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 901.388 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17812 | 17150 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3720 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17812 | 17150 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3720 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5990 | 5906 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Code name | TU116 | TU106B |
| Launch date | 29 Oct 2019 | 29 January 2019 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | |
| Place in performance rating | 218 | 215 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Price now | $349.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 62.74 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | 960 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 157.1 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.05 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.027 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1408 | 1920 |
| Pixel fill rate | 85.68 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 157.1 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 80 Watt |
| Transistor count | 6600 million | 10,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 9 inches (229 mm) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 336.0 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 192 bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
AMDRadeon HD 6550A
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
NVIDIATITAN Xp
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
NVIDIATesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
AMDRadeon 740M
