NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER and NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1405 MHz
- Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1582 MHz
- 413.7x more texture fill rate: 157.1 GTexel/s vs 379.7 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 125 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17812 vs 16138
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17812 vs 16138
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 29 Oct 2019 vs 4 November 2017 |
| Core clock speed | 1530 MHz vs 1405 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz vs 1582 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 157.1 GTexel/s vs 379.7 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17812 vs 16138 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17812 vs 16138 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3714 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
- 2.7x more pipelines: 3840 vs 1408
- 2x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 5% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 65520 vs 62640
- Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 296.223 vs 187.131
- Around 69% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4303.239 vs 2548.187
- Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 23.759 vs 15.882
- Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 163.551 vs 117.673
- Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1382.954 vs 901.388
- Around 83% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2345 vs 1282
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 3840 vs 1408 |
| Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 6 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 65520 vs 62640 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 296.223 vs 187.131 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4303.239 vs 2548.187 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 23.759 vs 15.882 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 163.551 vs 117.673 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1382.954 vs 901.388 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3351 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2345 vs 1282 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12715 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 804 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 62640 | 65520 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 187.131 | 296.223 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2548.187 | 4303.239 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 15.882 | 23.759 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.673 | 163.551 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 901.388 | 1382.954 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17812 | 16138 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17812 | 16138 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3355 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1282 | 2345 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Code name | TU116 | GP102 |
| Launch date | 29 Oct 2019 | 4 November 2017 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | $1,199 |
| Place in performance rating | 225 | 215 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz | 1582 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | 1405 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 157.1 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.05 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.027 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1408 | 3840 |
| Pixel fill rate | 85.68 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 157.1 GTexel/s | 379.7 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 6600 million | 11,800 million |
| Floating-point performance | 12,150 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 9 inches (229 mm) | 267 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 336.0 GB/s | 547.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 192 bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
| Memory clock speed | 11408 MHz | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
AMDRadeon HD 6550A
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
NVIDIATesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 56
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
AMDRadeon 780M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
NVIDIAL4
