NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• Around 26% higher core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1215 MHz
• Around 29% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1379 MHz
• 890.1x more texture fill rate: 157.1 GTexel/s vs 176.5 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12720 vs 9859
• Around 91% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 805 vs 422
• Around 52% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 62633 vs 41233
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2548.187 vs 2293.496
• Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 15.882 vs 12.704
• Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 901.388 vs 692.9
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17812 vs 14915
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17812 vs 14915

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q

• Around 45% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1408
• Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 125 Watt
• Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
• Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 214.123 vs 187.131
• Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 139.717 vs 117.673
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8902 vs 3717
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8048 vs 3351
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8902 vs 3717
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8048 vs 3351
• 3.8x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4887 vs 1283

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	12720 9859
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	805 422
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	62633 41233
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	187.131 214.123
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2548.187 2293.496
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15.882 12.704
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	117.673 139.717
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	901.388 692.9
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	17812 14915
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 8902
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3351 8048
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	17812 14915
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 8902
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3351 8048
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	1283 4887

Compare specifications (specs)