NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) vs AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) and AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 56% higher core clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 931 MHz
- Around 57% higher boost clock speed: 1590 MHz vs 1011 MHz
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 1536 vs 1280
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6144 MB vs 4 GB
- 17.1x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 700 MHz (1400 MHz effective)
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 487 vs 405
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10205 vs 4643
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 April 2019 vs 1 February 2018 |
Core clock speed | 1455 MHz vs 931 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1590 MHz vs 1011 MHz |
Pipelines | 1536 vs 1280 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Maximum memory size | 6144 MB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 700 MHz (1400 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 487 vs 405 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10205 vs 4643 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) | AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 487 | 405 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10205 | 4643 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5570 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 15109 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 15109 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16828 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16828 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8054 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8054 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) | AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | N18E-G0 | Polaris 22 |
Launch date | 23 April 2019 | 1 February 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 117 | 252 |
Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1590 MHz | 1011 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1455 MHz | 931 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 1536 | 1280 |
Transistor count | 6600 million | 5000 million |
Compute performance | 20 | |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 161.8 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.588 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.588 TFLOPS | |
Pixel fill rate | 32.35 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 80.88 GTexel/s | |
Texture Units | 65 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Interface | IGP | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Shader Model | 6.3 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6144 MB | 4 GB |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 1024 bit |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 700 MHz (1400 MHz effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s | |
Technologies |
||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |