NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) vs AMD Radeon RX 580X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) and AMD Radeon RX 580X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 1257 MHz
- Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 1590 MHz vs 1340 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 8000 MHz
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10205 vs 7798
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 15109 vs 4909
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 15109 vs 4909
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16828 vs 11616
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16828 vs 11616
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 April 2019 vs 3 April 2018 |
Core clock speed | 1455 MHz vs 1257 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1590 MHz vs 1340 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 8000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10205 vs 7798 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 15109 vs 4909 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 15109 vs 4909 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16828 vs 11616 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16828 vs 11616 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 580X
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1536
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6144 MB
- Around 82% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 885 vs 487
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 18294 vs 8054
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 18294 vs 8054
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 1536 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6144 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 885 vs 487 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 18294 vs 8054 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 18294 vs 8054 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 580X
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) | AMD Radeon RX 580X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 487 | 885 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10205 | 7798 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5570 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 15109 | 4909 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 15109 | 4909 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16828 | 11616 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16828 | 11616 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8054 | 18294 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8054 | 18294 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 41822 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) | AMD Radeon RX 580X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | N18E-G0 | Polaris 20 |
Launch date | 23 April 2019 | 3 April 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 117 | 162 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop, Laptop |
Design | Radeon RX 500X Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1590 MHz | 1340 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1455 MHz | 1257 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 1536 | 2304 |
Transistor count | 6600 million | 5,700 million |
Compute units | 36 | |
Floating-point performance | 6.2 TFLOPs | |
Pixel fill rate | 42.88 GP/s | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Texture fill rate | 192.96 GTexel/s | |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 185 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Length | 241 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6144 MB | 8 GB |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 8000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Memory bandwidth | 256 GB/s | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
TrueAudio | ||
VR Ready |