NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 8008 MHz
- 3.8x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5564 vs 1471
- 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 15109 vs 3638
- 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 15109 vs 3638
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16828 vs 16128
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16828 vs 16128
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8054 vs 3344
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8054 vs 3344
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 April 2019 vs 2 November 2017 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 8008 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5564 vs 1471 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 15109 vs 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 15109 vs 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16828 vs 16128 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16828 vs 16128 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8054 vs 3344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8054 vs 3344 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
- Around 10% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 1455 MHz
- Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1683 MHz vs 1590 MHz
- Around 58% higher pipelines: 2432 vs 1536
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6144 MB
- Around 84% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 876 vs 477
- Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14696 vs 10155
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz vs 1455 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1683 MHz vs 1590 MHz |
Pipelines | 2432 vs 1536 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6144 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 876 vs 477 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14696 vs 10155 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 477 | 876 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10155 | 14696 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5564 | 1471 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 15109 | 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 15109 | 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16828 | 16128 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16828 | 16128 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8054 | 3344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8054 | 3344 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55424 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 182.11 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1797.792 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.071 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.444 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1035.984 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Code name | N18E-G0 | GP104 |
Launch date | 23 April 2019 | 2 November 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 112 | 250 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
Price now | $379.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 44.74 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1590 MHz | 1683 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1455 MHz | 1607 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 1536 | 2432 |
Transistor count | 6600 million | 7,200 million |
Floating-point performance | 8,186 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 255.8 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6144 MB | 8 GB |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 8008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Memory bandwidth | 256.3 GB / s | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |