NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 53% higher core clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 954 MHz
- Around 60% higher boost clock speed: 1590 MHz vs 993 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 477 vs 330
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10155 vs 3814
- 3.5x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5564 vs 1611
- 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 15109 vs 3718
- 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 15109 vs 3718
- 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16828 vs 4501
- 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16828 vs 4501
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8054 vs 3356
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8054 vs 3356
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 April 2019 vs 12 March 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1455 MHz vs 954 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1590 MHz vs 993 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 477 vs 330 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10155 vs 3814 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5564 vs 1611 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 15109 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 15109 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16828 vs 4501 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16828 vs 4501 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8054 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8054 vs 3356 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6144 MB
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6144 MB |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 477 | 330 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10155 | 3814 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5564 | 1611 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 15109 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 15109 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16828 | 4501 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16828 | 4501 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8054 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8054 | 3356 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15023 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.273 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 777.677 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.914 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.196 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 82.511 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Kepler |
Code name | N18E-G0 | GK104 |
Launch date | 23 April 2019 | 12 March 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 112 | 737 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1590 MHz | 993 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1455 MHz | 954 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1536 | 1536 |
Transistor count | 6600 million | 3,540 million |
CUDA cores | 1536 | |
Floating-point performance | 3,050 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 127.1 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | ||
HDMI | ||
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Laptop size | medium sized | large |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6144 MB | 8 GB |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
BatteryBoost | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |