NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1290 MHz
- Around 21% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1468 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 10008 MHz
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12931 vs 11482
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 813 vs 731
- Around 34% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 61407 vs 45938
- Around 4% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 6260 vs 6008
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 22 February 2019 vs 27 June 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 1290 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz vs 1468 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 10008 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12931 vs 11482 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 813 vs 731 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 61407 vs 45938 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6260 vs 6008 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17105 vs 16952
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5581 vs 3718
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17105 vs 16952
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5581 vs 3718
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17105 vs 16952 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5581 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17105 vs 16952 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5581 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3355 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12931 | 11482 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 813 | 731 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 61407 | 45938 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 208.608 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2573.643 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.447 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 145.886 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 926.614 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16952 | 17105 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 5581 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16952 | 17105 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 5581 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3360 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6260 | 6008 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Code name | TU116 | GP104 |
Launch date | 22 February 2019 | 27 June 2017 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $279 | |
Place in performance rating | 200 | 182 |
Price now | $279.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 67.32 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz | 1468 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1290 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 6,600 million | 7,200 million |
Floating-point performance | 7,516 gflops | |
Pipelines | 2560 | |
Texture fill rate | 234.9 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 229 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 10008 MHz |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 320.3 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory type | GDDR5X | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |