NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1481 MHz
- Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1582 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 9% higher memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 11008 MHz
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 208.608 vs 205.837
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2573.643 vs 2406.499
- 5.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 145.886 vs 25.833
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16952 vs 15019
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16952 vs 15019
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 22 February 2019 vs 10 March 2017 |
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 1481 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz vs 1582 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 11008 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 208.608 vs 205.837 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2573.643 vs 2406.499 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 145.886 vs 25.833 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16952 vs 15019 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16952 vs 15019 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3716 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
- Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18558 vs 12931
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 937 vs 813
- Around 2% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 62406 vs 61432
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 19.591 vs 16.447
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1002.573 vs 926.614
- Around 58% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 9870 vs 6260
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 18558 vs 12931 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 937 vs 813 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 62406 vs 61432 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.591 vs 16.447 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1002.573 vs 926.614 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3355 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9870 vs 6260 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12931 | 18558 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 813 | 937 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 61432 | 62406 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 208.608 | 205.837 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2573.643 | 2406.499 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.447 | 19.591 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 145.886 | 25.833 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 926.614 | 1002.573 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16952 | 15019 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16952 | 15019 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6260 | 9870 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Code name | TU116 | GP102 |
| Launch date | 22 February 2019 | 10 March 2017 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $279 | $699 |
| Place in performance rating | 200 | 201 |
| Price now | $279.99 | $826.98 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 67.32 | 27.48 |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz | 1582 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1481 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 6,600 million | 11,800 million |
| Floating-point performance | 11,340 gflops | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 91 °C | |
| Pipelines | 3584 | |
| Texture fill rate | 354.4 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| G-SYNC support | ||
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 229 mm | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 11008 MHz |
| Maximum RAM amount | 11 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 484.4 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 352 Bit | |
| Memory type | GDDR5X | |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| HDMI 2.0b | ||
| PCIe 3.0 | ||
| SLI | ||
| Virtual Reality | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 4500 X2
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
AMDRadeon Vega Frontier Edition
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
AppleA14 Bionic
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
AMDRadeon 780M
