NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 9% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1382 MHz
• Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1600 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
• 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 300 Watt
• 6.3x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 1890 MHz
• Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 813 vs 750
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 208.608 vs 190.25
• Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16952 vs 12980
• Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16952 vs 12980

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition

• Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13327 vs 12931
• Around 23% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 75705 vs 61445
• Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3611.018 vs 2573.643
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 17.789 vs 16.447
• Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 181.113 vs 145.886
• Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1373.944 vs 926.614
• Around 13% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7074 vs 6260

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	12931 13327
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	813 750
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	61445 75705
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	208.608 190.25
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2573.643 3611.018
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16.447 17.789
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	145.886 181.113
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	926.614 1373.944
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16952 12980
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3718 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16952 12980
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3718 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 3356
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	6260 7074

Compare specifications (specs)