NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 20% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1246 MHz
- Around 28% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1380 MHz
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 6.8x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 1752 MHz
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12911 vs 12328
- Around 67% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 808 vs 484
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16952 vs 11451
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3555
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 3198
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16952 vs 11451
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3555
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 3198
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 22 February 2019 vs 21 June 2017 |
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 1246 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz vs 1380 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 1752 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12911 vs 12328 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 808 vs 484 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16952 vs 11451 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3555 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3198 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16952 vs 11451 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3555 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3198 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
- 2.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 170364 vs 60935
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 170364 vs 60935 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12911 | 12328 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 808 | 484 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 60935 | 170364 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 208.608 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2573.643 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.447 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 145.886 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 926.614 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16952 | 11451 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3555 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3198 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16952 | 11451 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3555 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3198 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1062 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Volta |
| Code name | TU116 | GV100 |
| Launch date | 22 February 2019 | 21 June 2017 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $279 | |
| Place in performance rating | 220 | 222 |
| Price now | $279.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 67.32 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz | 1380 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1246 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 6,600 million | 21,100 million |
| Floating-point performance | 14,131 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 5120 | |
| Texture fill rate | 441.6 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 229 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 1752 MHz |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 897.0 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 4096 Bit | |
| Memory type | HBM2 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
AMDRadeon HD 6550A
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
NVIDIATesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
IntelArc A310
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
AMDRadeon 740M
