NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 23% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1215 MHz
• Around 28% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1379 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 8008 MHz
• Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12908 vs 9873
• Around 90% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 808 vs 425
• Around 48% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 61068 vs 41233
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2573.643 vs 2293.496
• Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.447 vs 12.704
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 145.886 vs 139.717
• Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 926.614 vs 692.9
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16952 vs 14915
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16952 vs 14915

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q

• Around 4% lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 120 Watt
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 214.123 vs 208.608
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8902 vs 3718
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8048 vs 3355
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8902 vs 3718
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8048 vs 3355
• 4.6x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4887 vs 1062

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	12908 9873
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	808 425
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	61068 41233
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	208.608 214.123
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2573.643 2293.496
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16.447 12.704
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	145.886 139.717
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	926.614 692.9
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16952 14915
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3718 8902
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 8048
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16952 14915
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3718 8902
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 8048
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	1062 4887

Compare specifications (specs)