NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and AMD Radeon R9 FURY X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 69% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 275 Watt
- 11.4x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12900 vs 9484
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 807 vs 799
- Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 208.608 vs 155.307
- Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.447 vs 12.49
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 926.614 vs 857.575
- Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16952 vs 8673
- Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16952 vs 8673
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 22 February 2019 vs 24 June 2015 |
| Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 275 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12900 vs 9484 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 807 vs 799 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 208.608 vs 155.307 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.447 vs 12.49 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 926.614 vs 857.575 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16952 vs 8673 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16952 vs 8673 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
- Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3431.249 vs 2573.643
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 153.089 vs 145.886
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8925 vs 3718
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8925 vs 3718
- 4.9x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5170 vs 1061
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3431.249 vs 2573.643 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 153.089 vs 145.886 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8925 vs 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8925 vs 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 3355 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5170 vs 1061 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | AMD Radeon R9 FURY X |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12900 | 9484 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 807 | 799 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 61100 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 208.608 | 155.307 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2573.643 | 3431.249 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.447 | 12.49 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 145.886 | 153.089 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 926.614 | 857.575 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16952 | 8673 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 8925 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3361 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16952 | 8673 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 8925 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3361 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1061 | 5170 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | AMD Radeon R9 FURY X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | TU116 | Fiji |
| Launch date | 22 February 2019 | 24 June 2015 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $279 | $649 |
| Place in performance rating | 221 | 220 |
| Price now | $279.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 67.32 | |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 Fury Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 275 Watt |
| Transistor count | 6,600 million | 8,900 million |
| Compute units | 64 | |
| Floating-point performance | 8,602 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 4096 | |
| Stream Processors | 4096 | |
| Texture fill rate | 268.8 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 229 mm | 191 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Memory |
||
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 512 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 4096 Bit | |
| Memory type | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| FRTC | ||
| HD3D | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
AMDRadeon R9 FURY X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
NVIDIATesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 56
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
