NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and AMD Radeon R9 FURY X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 69% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1050 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
• 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 275 Watt
• 11.4x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 1050 MHz
• Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12908 vs 9496
• Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 808 vs 802
• Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 208.608 vs 155.307
• Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.447 vs 12.49
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 926.614 vs 857.575
• Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16952 vs 8673
• Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16952 vs 8673

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

• Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3431.249 vs 2573.643
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 153.089 vs 145.886
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8925 vs 3718
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8925 vs 3718
• 4.9x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5170 vs 1062

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	12908 9496
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	808 802
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	208.608 155.307
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2573.643 3431.249
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16.447 12.49
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	145.886 153.089
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	926.614 857.575
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16952 8673
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3718 8925
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 3361
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16952 8673
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3718 8925
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 3361
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	1062 5170

Compare specifications (specs)