NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 3.3x more core clock speed: 1476 MHz vs 450 MHz
- 28.8x more texture fill rate: 51.8 billion / sec vs 1.8 GTexel / s
- 60x more pipelines: 240 vs 4
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 90 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 256 MB
- Around 38% higher memory clock speed: 1242 MHz vs 900 MHz
- 33.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1513 vs 45
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 December 2008 vs 13 March 2006 |
Core clock speed | 1476 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 51.8 billion / sec vs 1.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 240 vs 4 |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 90 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1242 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1513 vs 45 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M
- 13.6x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 204 Watt
- Around 81% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 132 vs 73
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 204 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 132 vs 73 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1513 | 45 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 73 | 132 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 22124 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3347 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3347 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Curie |
Code name | GT200B | G72 |
Launch date | 23 December 2008 | 13 March 2006 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $359 | |
Place in performance rating | 1201 | 1190 |
Price now | $179.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 9.17 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1476 MHz | 450 MHz |
CUDA cores | 240 | |
Floating-point performance | 708.5 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 90 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Pipelines | 240 | 4 |
Texture fill rate | 51.8 billion / sec | 1.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 204 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 112 million |
Boost clock speed | 450 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVTwo Dual Link DVI | No outputs |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way3-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 159.0 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 350 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1242 MHz | 900 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | 64 |
Shared memory | no | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
SLI | ||
CineFX 4.0 | ||
Intellisample 4.0 | ||
PowerMizer 6.0 | ||
UltraShadow II |