NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M vs NVIDIA GeForce3
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M and NVIDIA GeForce3 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 7.5x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 200 MHz
- 23.8x more texture fill rate: 38 billion / sec vs 1.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 150 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 64 MB
- 127.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 636 vs 5
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 128 vs 120
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 February 2010 vs 27 February 2001 |
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 200 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 38 billion / sec vs 1.6 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 150 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 64 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 636 vs 5 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 128 vs 120 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce3
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M | NVIDIA GeForce3 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 636 | 5 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 128 | 120 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2172 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2172 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M | NVIDIA GeForce3 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla | Kelvin |
| Code name | G92 | NV20 A5 |
| Launch date | 1 February 2010 | 27 February 2001 |
| Place in performance rating | 1304 | 1307 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 200 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 128 | |
| Floating-point performance | 384.0 gflops | |
| Gigaflops | 576 | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 150 nm |
| Pipelines | 128 | |
| Texture fill rate | 38 billion / sec | 1.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 754 million | 57 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| Display Connectors | Single Link DVIVGALVDSHDMIDual Link DVIDisplayPort | 1x VGA, 1x DB13W3 |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | AGP 4x |
| Laptop size | large | |
| MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
| Length | 165 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.0 | 8.0 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 1.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 64 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 61 GB / s | 3.68 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | SDR |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
| Memory clock speed | 230 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| HybridPower | ||
| Power management | 8.0 | |
