NVIDIA Quadro 4000M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro 4000M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA Quadro 4000M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 4000M

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
2.6x more pipelines: 336 vs 128
Around 66% better floating-point performance: 638.4 gflops vs 384.0 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1282 vs 636
2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 271 vs 128

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	22 February 2011 vs 1 February 2010
Pipelines	336 vs 128
Floating-point performance	638.4 gflops vs 384.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm vs 65 nm
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 1 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1282 vs 636
PassMark - G2D Mark	271 vs 128

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M

3.2x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 475 MHz
Around 43% higher texture fill rate: 38 billion / sec vs 26.6 GTexel / s
Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 100 Watt
Around 73% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2172 vs 1254
Around 73% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2172 vs 1254

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1500 MHz vs 475 MHz
Texture fill rate	38 billion / sec vs 26.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt vs 100 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2172 vs 1254
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2172 vs 1254

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1282

636

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

271

128

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1254

2172

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1254

2172

Name	NVIDIA Quadro 4000M	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M
PassMark - G3D Mark	1282	636
PassMark - G2D Mark	271	128
Geekbench - OpenCL	5212
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	21.42
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	738.724
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.068
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	33.126
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	81.823
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1413
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	865
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1254	2172
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1413
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	865
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1254	2172

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro 4000M	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M
Essentials
Architecture	Fermi	Tesla
Code name	GF104	G92
Launch date	22 February 2011	1 February 2010
Launch price (MSRP)	$449
Place in performance rating	1303	1304
Price now	$111.99
Type	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Value for money (0-100)	19.30
Technical info
Core clock speed	475 MHz	1500 MHz
Floating-point performance	638.4 gflops	384.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	65 nm
Pipelines	336	128
Texture fill rate	26.6 GTexel / s	38 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	100 Watt	75 Watt
Transistor count	1,950 million	754 million
CUDA cores		128
Gigaflops		576
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	Single Link DVIVGALVDSHDMIDual Link DVIDisplayPort
Audio input for HDMI		S / PDIF
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	MXM-B (3.0)
Laptop size	large	large
Bus support		PCI-E 2.0
MXM Type		MXM 3.0 Type-B
SLI options		2-way
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	10.0
OpenGL	4.6	2.1
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	1 GB
Memory bandwidth	80.0 GB / s	61 GB / s
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	2500 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR3
Shared memory	0	0
Technologies
CUDA
HybridPower
Power management		8.0