NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M and NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+ videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 88% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 141 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 636 vs 494
- Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 128 vs 83
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 February 2010 vs 16 January 2009 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 141 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 636 vs 494 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 128 vs 83 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+
- Around 22% higher core clock speed: 1836 MHz vs 1500 MHz
- Around 24% higher texture fill rate: 47.2 billion / sec vs 38 billion / sec
- Around 22% better floating-point performance: 470.0 gflops vs 384.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 vs 2172
- Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 vs 2172
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1836 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 47.2 billion / sec vs 38 billion / sec |
| Floating-point performance | 470.0 gflops vs 384.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 65 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 vs 2172 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 vs 2172 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+ |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 636 | 494 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 128 | 83 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2172 | 3309 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2172 | 3309 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 54.055 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.986 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.56 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 108.412 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+ | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
| Code name | G92 | G92B |
| Launch date | 1 February 2010 | 16 January 2009 |
| Place in performance rating | 1304 | 1305 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1836 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 128 | 128 |
| Floating-point performance | 384.0 gflops | 470.0 gflops |
| Gigaflops | 576 | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 55 nm |
| Pipelines | 128 | 128 |
| Texture fill rate | 38 billion / sec | 47.2 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 141 Watt |
| Transistor count | 754 million | 754 million |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | S / PDIF |
| Display Connectors | Single Link DVIVGALVDSHDMIDual Link DVIDisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVDual Link DVI |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
| SLI options | 2-way | 2-way3-way |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 61 GB / s | 70.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
| Memory clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| HybridPower | ||
| Power management | 8.0 | |
| 3D Vision | ||
| SLI | ||
