NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 3x more pipelines: 384 vs 128
- Around 96% better floating-point performance: 752.6 gflops vs 384.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 793 vs 636
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 149 vs 128
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3339 vs 2172
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3339 vs 2172
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 April 2013 vs 1 February 2010 |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 128 |
| Floating-point performance | 752.6 gflops vs 384.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 65 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 793 vs 636 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 149 vs 128 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 vs 2172 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 vs 2172 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M
- Around 85% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 810 MHz
- 2.4x more texture fill rate: 38 billion / sec vs 15.68 GTexel / s
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 810 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 38 billion / sec vs 15.68 GTexel / s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 793 | 636 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 149 | 128 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3866 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.392 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 157.479 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.864 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 16.101 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 44.77 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1589 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3235 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 | 2172 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1589 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3235 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 | 2172 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 345 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Tesla |
| Code name | GK107 | G92 |
| Launch date | 1 April 2013 | 1 February 2010 |
| Place in performance rating | 1301 | 1304 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 980 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 810 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 752.6 gflops | 384.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 128 |
| Texture fill rate | 15.68 GTexel / s | 38 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 754 million |
| CUDA cores | 128 | |
| Gigaflops | 576 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Single Link DVIVGALVDSHDMIDual Link DVIDisplayPort |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | ||
| HDMI | ||
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI-E 2.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Laptop size | medium sized | large |
| MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 10.0 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 61 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1802 MHz | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
| Standard memory configuration | DDR3 / GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| HybridPower | ||
| Power management | 8.0 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M with others
NVIDIAGeForce GT 740M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 285M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 740M vs
NVIDIAQuadro 4000M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 740M vs
AMDRadeon HD 7660G IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GT 740M vs
NVIDIAQuadro K610M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 740M vs
AMDRadeon R5 235 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GT 740M vs
AMDRadeon R5 M240
