NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M vs NVIDIA GeForce3 Ti500
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M and NVIDIA GeForce3 Ti500 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 6.3x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 240 MHz
- 19.8x more texture fill rate: 38 billion / sec vs 1.92 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 150 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 64 MB
- 212x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 636 vs 3
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 128 vs 116
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 February 2010 vs 1 October 2001 |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 240 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 38 billion / sec vs 1.92 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 150 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 64 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 636 vs 3 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 128 vs 116 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce3 Ti500
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M | NVIDIA GeForce3 Ti500 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 636 | 3 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 128 | 116 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2172 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2172 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M | NVIDIA GeForce3 Ti500 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Kelvin |
Code name | G92 | NV20 A5 |
Launch date | 1 February 2010 | 1 October 2001 |
Place in performance rating | 1292 | 1294 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $349 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 240 MHz |
CUDA cores | 128 | |
Floating-point performance | 384.0 gflops | |
Gigaflops | 576 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 150 nm |
Pipelines | 128 | |
Texture fill rate | 38 billion / sec | 1.92 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Transistor count | 754 million | 57 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
Display Connectors | Single Link DVIVGALVDSHDMIDual Link DVIDisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | AGP 4x |
Laptop size | large | |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
Length | 183 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 8.0 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 1.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 64 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 61 GB / s | 8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Memory clock speed | 500 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
Power management | 8.0 |