NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M vs ATI Radeon HD 4850
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M and ATI Radeon HD 4850 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 625 MHz
- Around 52% higher texture fill rate: 38 billion / sec vs 25 GTexel / s
- Around 47% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 110 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 128 vs 79
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 February 2010 vs 25 June 2008 |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 625 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 38 billion / sec vs 25 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 110 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 128 vs 79 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4850
- 6.3x more pipelines: 800 vs 128
- 2.6x better floating-point performance: 1,000.0 gflops vs 384.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 934 vs 636
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3344 vs 2172
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3344 vs 2172
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 800 vs 128 |
Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops vs 384.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 65 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 934 vs 636 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 vs 2172 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 vs 2172 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4850
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M | ATI Radeon HD 4850 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 636 | 934 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 128 | 79 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2172 | 3344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2172 | 3344 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M | ATI Radeon HD 4850 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | TeraScale |
Code name | G92 | RV770 |
Launch date | 1 February 2010 | 25 June 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1291 | 1292 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 625 MHz |
CUDA cores | 128 | |
Floating-point performance | 384.0 gflops | 1,000.0 gflops |
Gigaflops | 576 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 128 | 800 |
Texture fill rate | 38 billion / sec | 25 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 110 Watt |
Transistor count | 754 million | 956 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
Display Connectors | Single Link DVIVGALVDSHDMIDual Link DVIDisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
Length | 246 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 61 GB / s | 63.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
Power management | 8.0 |